Exploring Communications

[Update]: I just saw this one from a fellow member of a group (@Hank Shrier) in LinkedIn called Writing Mafia… had to add it:

sesquipedalianism (plural sesquipedalianisms)

1. (uncountable) The practice of using long, sometimes obscure, words in speech or writing. ?[quotations ?]
   • 1995, Michael Cart, From Romance to Realism, ISBN 0060242892, page 257:

     His voice here is a marvelous juxtaposition of cool elegance, unaffected hipness, unabashed sesquipedalianism (“the rich bouquet of exuded sebaceousness”) and swell conversational slang (…)

2. (countable) A very long word.

Definition source: http://en.wiktionary.org

[Original]:

I often come across interesting words penned by my fellow Twitterers and keep thinking that I’d like to use those words sometime… so rather than lose them to the cluttered filling cabinet in my mind; here they are and may they benefit your vocabulary also: (I will update as I find more and please feel free to add more!)

(explanations from my iMac’s dictionary)

scuppering [@susan_m]
verb [ trans. ] chiefly Brit.
sink (a ship or its crew) deliberately.
• informal prevent from working or succeeding; thwart : plans for a casino were scuppered by a public inquiry.
ORIGIN late 19th cent. (as military slang in the sense [kill, esp. in an ambush] ): of unknown origin. The sense [sink] dates from the 1970s.

Placebo [@neerav via @fridley]: noun ( pl. -bos)
a harmless pill, medicine, or procedure prescribed more for the psychological benefit to the patient than for any physiological effect : his Aunt Beatrice had been kept alive on sympathy and placebos for thirty years | [as adj. ] placebo drugs.
• a substance that has no therapeutic effect, used as a control in testing new drugs.
• figurative a measure designed merely to calm or please someone.
ORIGIN late 18th cent.: from Latin, literally ‘I shall please,’ from placere ‘to please.’ Interestingly I also found out the word “placebo” originates from 14th century tradition of hiring fake mourners to wail and cry at funerals…

Lambasting (@matthewgain): lambaste |lam?be?st| (also lambast |-?bast|)
verb [ trans. ]
criticize (someone or something) harshly : they lambasted the report as a gross distortion of the truth.
ORIGIN mid 17th cent. (in the sense [beat, thrash] ): from lam 1 + baste 3 . The current sense dates from the late 19th cent.

Avatar (@vipvirtualsols etc): ??I couldn’t resist this one as the movie was awesome and I love the feeling this one makes in your mouth when you say it… noun chiefly Hinduism
a manifestation of a deity or released soul in bodily form on earth; an incarnate divine teacher.
• an incarnation, embodiment, or manifestation of a person or idea : he set himself up as a new avatar of Arab radicalism.
• Computing a movable icon representing a person in cyberspace or virtual reality graphics.
ORIGIN from Sanskrit avat?ra ‘descent,’ from ava ‘down’ + tar- ‘to cross.’

Churlish (@matthewgain): adjective
rude in a mean-spirited and surly way : it seems churlish to complain.
DERIVATIVES
churlishly adverb
churlishness noun
ORIGIN Old English cierlisc, ceorlisc (see churl , -ish 1 ).

Delimiter (@trib): verb ( -limited , -limiting ) [ trans. ]
determine the limits or boundaries of : agreements delimiting fishing zones.
DERIVATIVES
delimitation |-?te??(?)n| noun
delimiter noun
ORIGIN mid 19th cent.: from French délimiter, from Latin delimitare, from de- ‘down, completely’ + limitare (from limes, limit- ‘boundary, limit’ ). ALSO the name of online news service, Delimiter, launched in Australia to compete with AAP, covering IT&T and consumer tech news.

I have been inspired to write again… feeling very slack for not having posted in such a long time… but inspired by a fellow writer who has quite an amazing blog about a year of self discovery, tasking herself with learning a new thing every day. Check it out – Giving Back Girl.

My biggest take from Lisa’s blog is her passion for writing, much like when you see a painting on a wall that is just bursting with life, even though it’s just a 2D image. So, how do you get that passion, where do you find that voice? I am not really sure I know how to answer that question. I find that if I am writing for work regarding business matters, there is still the need for passion or light and dark, and perhaps finding that is harder than if you were writing about personal experience. Partly, I think it’s about immersing yourself in the scene as it were. Putting yourself on your canvas and looking out at the readers, and seeing what their expression would show. Comprehension, disbelief, confusion, kinship… So by essentially turning yourself into the words  you force yourself to understand far more intimately who you’re writing for. If it’s yourself or people who follow a similar life to you, a lot easier. If I am writing for a bunch of Chief Technology Officers or business leaders it’s quite a different kettle of fish. But the key is understanding their language before you start.

The passion I have for writing is that to me words are a living entity and it’s how you put them together that delivers a meaning… but also how the reader interprets those words. I’ve just read a wonderful book about painters called The Swan Thieves by Elizabeth Kostova (who also wrote The Historian and one of my all time favourite novels). Through her characters and exquisite writing she is able to help the reader understand what a painting with its own life is all about.  Subsequently I had the pleasure of attending a ‘private’ viewing of the Archibold Prize at the NSW Art Gallery. When looking at the paintings I was able to feel the soul and the passion of some of the paintings. Whilst the feelings I experienced might not have been exactly what the painter felt, probably quite different, yet I was still moved by the experience. This is what I think a good piece of writing should always endeavour to do; evoke a feeling or passion for the reader… to give them a new life experience. Hopefully, when that inner novel inside me is able to pop out that I too evoke that level of passion and that I help others experience something new and amazing. I just have to figure out how to get it out… and then I will share.

This morning as my #1 kid added a new word to his repertoire (to my shame it came straight from Ben10 via Cartoon Network)… and the word was ‘like’… but not used in the traditional sense of the word, but in the more youthful sense where you just like add it into like the sentence that you are like using because like it sounds like really good. Whilst I was the word grated on my nerves as I heard him say it, I was instantly transported back to my father giving me a hard time about it when I was in my teens.

So it has prompted me to write this post… not just in the exploration of the word ‘like’, but generally about how words change over time. It’s what excites me about language; the way it evolves and how a generation can have such an impact on how words are used.

According to the Oxford Dictionary ‘like’ has a few meanings… which depending on your interpretation actually includes the way my son used it… although I am sure it wasn’t in there when I was a teenager and I am sure it doesn’t mean to add it more than once to a sentence. The origins of the word date back to the 13^th and 14^th centuries, with the 1500s seemingly being the first use of the word in its form as it is today. So it’s been around for a very long time… no wonder the meaning is flexible and Generation X started playing with its usage.

So how does language evolve in this way? The abundance of International television, mainly from the USA has had an enormous impact on the Australian vernacular. However, it seems the influence on the use of words or expressions can come from varying influences. For example, according to Angus Stevenson (www.askoxford.com) the expression ‘go pear shaped’ (meaning to go wrong) supposedly comes from RAF slang, first written in the early 1980s but most probably in use a few decades before that in reference to the shape of a fighter plane after it has crashed into the ground or a novice’s attempt at a perfect circle in the air.

Considering the way communications has vastly changed from the early 80s, the impact online communication will be having on language would be significant. Just the impact of the TXT message has change the way I write emails and communicate with friends, family and colleagues. I’ve been told I am the queen of the succinct TXT msg and I am secretly proud of that.

Another avenue in the online world has been the advent of social media, more specifically the requirement to get our point across in 140 characters; delivered instantly to many. So perhaps my son or one of his generational peers will be studying the impact all this has had on language in 20 or 30 years time.

Whilst many have been scared or pessimistic about the impact technology is having, handled in the right way I see enormous benefits not just to you in your immediate community but for the world, in bringing us closer to share and communicate. Whilst there are segments of the technology world that have valid opponents, I am hoping the greater good will prevail and the impact my grandchildren (gosh I hope I get some one day) will experience will only enhance their communication and the way they use words and language. Perhaps they will more easily be multilingual… or perhaps even a new language will evolve, and I am not talking techno speak, but with common use words in one language being used by those of other nationalities. Of course, we have plenty of that already in existence… some words are just better said in their original language: hors d’oeuvres, hasta la vista (if you’re a Terminator fan), à la carte or annus horribilis.

I look forward to watching how my native tongue evolves and as I sit in my rocking chair trying to understand my grandkids in 30 or so years I hope I take as much pleasure in learning and using it as I do now.